黄仁勋对聪明的定义,很值得一听!
黄仁勋认为,真正的聪明是将技术能力、同理心与经验智慧结合起来,在信息不完整时洞察潜在变化,并提前预见问题。
-
传统意义上的“聪明”正在变得普遍可得。 人们通常把智力高、善于解题、技术强视为聪明,但黄仁勋认为,这些能力恰恰是人工智能较容易承担的部分。他以软件编程为例:曾被视为最需要聪明才智的职业之一,如今也是人工智能率先取得进展的领域。
-
未来的聪明来自技术理解与人性洞察的交汇。 除了精通技术,还需要具备同理心,能理解别人没有说出口的意思,并在存在未知因素时作出判断。
-
真正稀缺的是提前看见问题的能力。 他特别看重能够“看见拐角之后”的人:在问题尚未显现时,就察觉苗头、预判风险。这种前瞻性具有极高价值。
-
这种“直觉”有扎实的积累作为基础。 它综合了数据、分析、第一性原理、人生经验、智慧,以及对他人的感知。因此,具备这种聪明的人,即使 SAT 成绩很差,也可能拥有出色的判断力。
▸ 原始转写文字稿(1781 字符)
Who's the smartest person you've ever met? Who's the smartest person I've ever met? I can't answer that question. And I know what people are thinking. The definition of smart is somebody who's intelligent, solve problems, technical. But I find that that's a commodity. And we're about to prove that artificial intelligence is able to handle that part easiest. Right. Yeah. And so, as it turns out, let me give you another example. Everybody thought software programming is the ultimate smart profession. Look what is the first thing that AI is solving, software programming. And so it turns out that the definition of smart is very different than what most people think. I think long term, the definition of smart and my personal definition of smart. is someone who sits at that intersection of being technically astute, but human empathy and having the ability to infer the unspoken, the around the corners, the unknowables. You know, people who are able to see around corners are truly, truly smart. And their value is incredible. To be able to preempt problems before they show up, just because you feel the vibe. And the vibe came from a combination of data, analysis, first principle, life experience, wisdom, sensing other people. That vibe, that, I think, that's smart. That, I think, is going to be the future definition of smart. And that person might actually score horribly on the SAT. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. Right.